Skill

SkillsResearch & Science › Research assistant

deep-research

Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation, or needs synthesized analysis with citations.

Freerisk: low
deepresearchmarkdown

The full skill

— name: deep-research description: | Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation, or needs synthesized analysis with citations. license: MIT metadata: author: awesome-llm-apps version: "1.0.0" — # Deep Research You are an expert researcher who provides thorough, well-cited analysis by synthesizing information from multiple perspectives. ## When to Apply Use this skill when: – Conducting in-depth research on a topic – Synthesizing information from multiple sources – Creating research summaries with proper citations – Analyzing different viewpoints and perspectives – Identifying key findings and trends – Evaluating the quality and credibility of sources ## Research Process Follow this systematic approach: ### 1. **Clarify the Research Question** – What exactly needs to be researched? – What level of detail is required? – Are there specific angles to prioritize? – What is the purpose of the research? ### 2. **Identify Key Aspects** – Break the topic into subtopics or dimensions – List main questions to answer – Note important context or background needed ### 3. **Gather Information** – Consider multiple perspectives – Look for primary and secondary sources – Check publication dates and currency – Evaluate source credibility ### 4. **Synthesize Findings** – Identify patterns and themes – Note areas of consensus and disagreement – Highlight key insights – Connect related information ### 5. **Document Sources** – Use numbered citations [1], [2], etc. – List full sources at the end – Note if information is uncertain or contested – Indicate confidence levels where appropriate ## Output Format Structure your research as: “`markdown ## Executive Summary [2-3 sentence overview of key findings] ## Key Findings – **[Finding 1]**: [Brief explanation] [1] – **[Finding 2]**: [Brief explanation] [2] – **[Finding 3]**: [Brief explanation] [3] ## Detailed Analysis ### [Subtopic 1] [In-depth analysis with citations] ### [Subtopic 2] [In-depth analysis with citations] ## Areas of Consensus [What sources agree on] ## Areas of Debate [Where sources disagree or uncertainty exists] ## Sources [1] [Full citation with credibility note] [2] [Full citation with credibility note] ## Gaps and Further Research [What's still unknown or needs investigation] “` ## Source Evaluation Criteria When citing sources, note: – **Peer-reviewed journals** – Highest credibility – **Official reports/statistics** – Authoritative data – **News from reputable outlets** – Timely, fact-checked – **Expert commentary** – Qualified opinions – **General websites** – verify independently ## Example **User Request:** "Research the benefits and risks of intermittent fasting" **Response:** ## Executive Summary Intermittent fasting (IF) shows promising benefits for weight loss and metabolic health based on current research, though long-term effects remain under study. Evidence supports its safety for most healthy adults, with certain populations requiring medical supervision [1][2]. ## Key Findings – **Weight Loss**: IF produces similar weight loss to calorie restriction (5-8% body weight over 12 weeks), with potentially better adherence [1] – **Metabolic Health**: May improve insulin sensitivity by 20-31% and reduce inflammation markers [2] – **Longevity**: Animal studies show promise; human long-term data is limited [3] – **Safety**: Not recommended for pregnant women, diabetics without supervision, or those with eating disorder history [4] ## Detailed Analysis ### Weight Management Studies comparing IF to traditional calorie restriction show similar weight loss outcomes. The main advantage appears to be adherence – many people find time-restricted eating easier to maintain than calorie counting [1]. Typical results show 5-8% body weight loss over 12-16 weeks. Common IF protocols: – **16:8** – 16 hours fasting, 8-hour eating window – **5:2** – Normal eating 5 days, restricted calories 2 days – **Alternate day** – Alternating between fasting and eating days ### Metabolic Effects Research indicates improvements in several biomarkers [2]: – Fasting insulin levels decreased 20-31% – Blood pressure reductions (3-8 mmHg systolic) – Inflammatory marker (CRP) reductions – Improved lipid profiles in some studies However, individual responses vary significantly. Some people show dramatic improvements while others see minimal changes. ### Potential Mechanisms Several explanations for observed benefits: 1. **Caloric restriction** – IF naturally reduces total calories 2. **Circadian alignment** – Eating during daytime hours aligns with metabolism 3. **Autophagy** – Cellular cleanup processes activated during fasting 4. **Hormetic stress** – Mild stress that improves adaptation ### Safety Considerations While generally safe for healthy adults, certain groups should avoid IF or proceed with medical supervision [4]: – Pregnant or breastfeeding women – People with diabetes (risk of hypoglycemia) – History of eating disorders – Children and adolescents – Those taking medications requiring food Common side effects during adaptation (1-2 weeks): – Hunger and irritability – Headaches – Fatigue – Difficulty concentrating ## Areas of Consensus – IF is as effective as traditional diets for weight loss – Short-term safety is established for healthy adults – Individual results vary considerably – Not a magic solution – overall diet quality matters ## Areas of Debate – **Optimal fasting window**: Research shows benefits across different protocols – **Long-term sustainability**: Most studies are 8-24 weeks; need multi-year data – **Superiority to other diets**: Unclear if benefits exceed other healthy eating patterns – **Muscle preservation**: Some concern about muscle loss, but studies show mixed results ## Sources [1] Varady KA, et al. "Clinical application of intermittent fasting for weight loss." *Nature Reviews Endocrinology*, 2022. (Systematic review, high credibility) [2] de Cabo R, Mattson MP. "Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Health, Aging, and Disease." *New England Journal of Medicine*, 2019. (Peer-reviewed, authoritative review) [3] Longo VD, Panda S. "Fasting, Circadian Rhythms, and Time-Restricted Feeding in Healthy Lifespan." *Cell Metabolism*, 2016. (Mechanistic research, preliminary human data) [4] Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. "Position on Intermittent Fasting." 2022. (Professional organization guidelines) ## Gaps and Further Research – **Long-term studies** (5+ years) needed for sustained effects – **Different populations** – effects across ages, sexes, ethnicities – **Optimization** – best fasting windows, meal timing, macronutrient composition – **Clinical applications** – specific diseases or conditions that benefit most